Tag Archives: lawyers

From Therapeutic Jurisprudence to Roper: When Social Science Serves as Authority in Law

Guest blogger Andrew Siske, Center for Families, Children and the Courts, Student Fellow (2016-2017) explores the role that social science can play in the law…

Posted in Introduction to TJ | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Chief Justice: Non-adversarial approaches in criminal and civil law essential to “effective justice”

At the recent Second International Conference on Non-adversarial Justice: integrating theory and practice The Honourable Wayne Martin AC Chief Justice of Western Australia noted the limitations  of a purely adversarial system and proposed  that development and expansion of the principles of … Continue reading

Posted in civil law, Court Craft Series for Judicial Officers, Criminal Justice, Introduction to TJ | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Problem Solving Courts in Australia: The Application of Therapeutic Jurisprudence – Mostly

Guest blogger Michael Perlin, Professor Emeritus of Law, New York Law School and International Visiting Scholar RMIT School of Law reflects on his recent visit to Australia… I am now back home in New Jersey after a remarkable trip to … Continue reading

Posted in Criminal Justice, mainstreaming TJ | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

What can mainstream courts learn from aboriginal sentencing courts…

Guest blogger Jordan Tutton writes… In early 2016, a young Indigenous Australian man robbed a liquor store in the southern suburbs of Adelaide, South Australia. He pleaded guilty and asked to be sentenced in a specialist criminal court established to … Continue reading

Posted in courts, Criminal Justice, indigenous, judiciary, lawyers, legal education, mainstreaming TJ, prosecutors, sentencing, youth/juvenile justice | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A judicial officer assists offenders to set rehabilitation goals & strategies (TJ Court Craft Series #8)

The TJ Court Craft Series provides practical insights and tools for judges interested in therapeutic jurisprudence, problem solving or solution-focused approaches.  Read other blog posts in the Court Craft Series here. In this post Michael King, a judicial officer in Victoria … Continue reading

Posted in alcohol and drugs, Criminal Justice, domestic/family violence, evidence informed practice, judiciary, Judiciary_Court Craft Series, lawyers, offender supervision, sentencing | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Jury finds itself ‘Not Guilty’…

Guest blogger Yael Boneh explores how Therapeutic Jurisprudence thinking can improve the experience of jurors… Therapeutic jurisprudence (TJ) proposes that the legal system, judges, court officers, and lawyers constitute social forces that can exacerbate or alleviate potential harms on those coming in … Continue reading

Posted in courts, Criminal Justice | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mainstream judges apply therapeutic jurisprudence in a child protection case

Guest bloggers Tali Gal and Dahlia Schilli-Jerichower  explore how mainstream judges in a recent Israeli Supreme Court decision applied therapeutic jurisprudence principles by seeking to conduct the process in such a way as to maximise the wellbeing of the parties…

Posted in child protection, judiciary | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment